Supreme Court declines challenge to US Covid vaccine rule for workers
 
 
 
 
 
 

Supreme Court declines challenge to US Covid vaccine rule for health workers

/ 09:02 AM October 03, 2022

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a challenge by Missouri and nine other states – mostly Republican-led – to President Joe Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for workers in healthcare facilities that receive federal funds.

The justices turned away an appeal by the states after a lower court declined to immediately consider their claims that the vaccine rule violates federal administrative law and tramples overpowers reserved for the states under the U.S. Constitution. The Democratic president’s administration issued the rule in November 2021.

The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision in January to let Biden enforce the healthcare worker mandate while litigation on its legal merits continued in lower courts. The justices, at the same time, decided 6-3 to halt his administration’s rule requiring vaccines or weekly COVID-19 tests for employees at businesses with at least 100 employees.

ADVERTISEMENT

Biden’s administration had argued that the two mandates would save lives and strengthen the U.S. economy by increasing the number of vaccinated Americans. The United States leads the world in COVID-19 deaths, reporting more than a million since the pandemic took hold in the early months of 2020.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Supreme Court declines challenge to US vaccine rule for health workers

The federal healthcare worker rule requires vaccination for about 10.3 million workers at 76,000 healthcare facilities, including hospitals and nursing homes that accept money from the Medicare and Medicaid government health insurance programs for the elderly, disabled, and low-income Americans.

The Supreme Court in January concluded that Biden’s regulation fits within the power Congress conferred on the federal government to impose conditions on Medicaid and Medicare funds. It decided that ensuring that medical providers take steps to avoid transmitting a dangerous virus to their patients is consistent with the “fundamental principle of the medical profession: first, do no harm.”

Missouri sued alongside Nebraska, Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming – winning an injunction against the requirement in those states.

The mandate had also been blocked in 15 other states, including Arizona and Texas, following litigation there. After the justices in January stayed preliminary injunctions issued by lower courts against the rule, including in Missouri’s lawsuit, the state asked the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to expedite the hearing of the merits of the case.

In April, the 8th Circuit instead sent the case back to a federal judge to proceed to a trial. Missouri then appealed to the Supreme Court, contending that the mandate violates federal administrative law and tramples overpower reserved to the states under the Constitution.

MORE STORIES
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
TAGS: Health and Wellness, US Supreme Court
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.




We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.