Federal judge strikes down Obamacare; not so fast, say analysts | Inquirer
 
 
 
 
 
 

Federal judge strikes down Obamacare; not so fast, say analysts

/ 11:50 PM December 19, 2018

Affordable Care Act supporters. AP PHOTO

The Affordable Care Act was again thrust into uncertainty with Federal District Judge Reed O’Connor’s ruling Friday, Dec. 17, that eliminating the tax penalty for not having insurance renders the entire law unconstitutional.

A special bonus episode of KHN’s “What the Health?” discussed the ramifications of this ruling. The podcast featured panelists Julie Rovner of Kaiser Health News, Joanne Kenen of Politico, Stephanie Armour of The Wall Street Journal and Paige Winfield Cunningham of The Washington Post.

Among the takeaways:

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

  • Because Judge Reed O’Connor did not issue an injunction after ruling the ACA unconstitutional, supporters of the law cannot file immediately for an appeal. The process will be more complicated.
  • Although conservative legal scholars likely might agree with the judge that the mandate to have coverage cannot stand without the penalty — based on Chief Justice John Roberts’ landmark ruling in the first challenge to the law — many did not expect that other broad aspects of the ACA would also be thrown out in this case.
  • Although the issue will play out in the courts, Congress will face pressure on how to handle the decision. Lawmakers could easily remedy this situation by instituting a 1-cent penalty against people who don’t have insurance. But finding consensus on a plan forward looks difficult.
  • Much of the focus by the public after the decision has been on the 10 million people who buy insurance through the ACA marketplaces and the 12 million who are covered through their states’ Medicaid expansion. But the law had much broader reach, including protections for people with preexisting conditions, an end to lifetime caps for all consumers, requirements on how much of their revenue insurers must spend on customers’ coverage and efforts to improve quality at hospitals, nursing homes and doctors’ offices.

This story was produced by Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Want stories like this delivered straight to your inbox? Stay informed. Stay ahead. Subscribe to InqMORNING

Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
TAGS: Affordable Care Act, health, Health and Wellness, judges, Obamacare
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.




This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.