Celebrity memecoins: Fortune or fraud?

Disclaimer: This article is intended for US audiences.

We are seeing the return of a trend: the token launched by a celebrity. These tokens are often tied to a celebrity’s intellectual property and presented to fans as unique investment opportunities.

This phenomenon has, however, triggered significant controversies and legal controls, mainly to determine whether these tokens can be considered investments and, if so, whether they violate current financial standards.

This concept is relatively simple. A celebrity, taking advantage of his notoriety and image, creates a digital asset on the blockchain.

These tokens can have a variety of uses, such as granting fans exclusive access to content, merchandise, or events. Some are even presented as investment opportunities with the promise of potential gains.

For fans the temptation is great: they can own part of their idol’s brand and potentially profit from his success.

What Does The Law Say About Celebrity Tokens?

The first legal question about these tokens is whether they can be considered securities under existing financial regulations. In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) applies the Howey test to determine whether a transaction can be considered an investment and therefore a security.

The Howey Test considers that a transaction is a security if it constitutes a financial investment, in a common enterprise if the investors expect profits from their investment without having a real impact on the success of the enterprise.

Applying the Howey test to celebrity tokens highlights several key points:

• First, fans invest money to buy these tokens.
• Second, the success of the token is often tied to the celebrity’s reputation and activities, which constitutes a common enterprise.
• Finally, the expectation of profits is an important factor, especially when tokens are marketed as investment opportunities.
  Therefore, some of these tokens likely meet the criteria for being considered securities.

The SEC has already taken action against several prominent individuals and organizations in the cryptocurrency industry. For example, in 2018, the SEC sanctioned professional boxer Floyd Mayweather and music producer DJ Khaled for promoting Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) without disclosing that they had been paid for doing so.

Similarly, in 2020, the SEC indicted actor Steven Seagal for failing to disclose payments he received to promote an ICO.

Same thing for Kim Kardashian in 2022. She was accused of promoting the crypto asset EthereumMax on social media without revealing that she was paid to do so.

Kim Kardashian has agreed to plead guilty to the charges, pay penalties, disgorgement, and interest totaling $1.26 million, and participate in the Commission’s ongoing investigation.

SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said:

“This case reminds us that when celebrities or influencers endorse investment offerings, including cryptocurrencies, it should not be concluded that these investment products are suitable for all investors.”

“We encourage investors to consider the potential risks and prospects of an investment based on their own financial objectives.”

These actions underscore the SEC’s position that celebrities who endorse cryptocurrency investments must comply with securities laws. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties, including fines and bans from participating in future securities investments.

Behind Celebrity Tokens

Beyond the legal implications, celebrity tokens raise ethical concerns. Celebrities wield considerable influence over their fans, many of whom lack the financial literacy to fully understand the risks of investing in digital tokens.

This phenomenon results in an unbalanced balance of power, with fans being influenced by their admiration for the celebrity rather than by a reasoned assessment of the qualities of the investment.

However, not all projects in the meme coin space are created equal. While some celebrity-backed tokens may raise red flags, innovative projects like Crypto All-Stars are reshaping the landscape. 

Crypto All-Stars introduces the world’s first-ever ‘MemeVault’ — a staking protocol that unifies multi-token, multi-chain meme coin staking. By vaulting popular meme coins, fans and investors alike can earn $STARS tokens, which serve as the platform’s lifeblood.

This concept represents a shift from traditional celebrity tokens, offering tangible value through staking and incentivizing holders across the meme coin ecosystem. Although the risks associated with meme coins remain, projects like Crypto All-Stars demonstrate that there are opportunities for fans to engage with digital assets in a more structured and rewarding manner.

The Moral Question

While not all celebrity tokens are ICOs, the parallels are clear: the void of regulation and oversight in the cryptocurrency space creates an environment ripe for fraud and poor financial governance.

Proponents of these tokens say they represent a new and innovative way for celebrities to engage with their fans. By issuing tokens, celebrities can create unique experiences and foster a sense of community with their fans. In this way, these tokens can provide a new source of revenue for celebrities, allowing them to monetize their brand in unique ways.

However, as projects like Crypto All-Stars show, there is potential for more ethical and financially sound ways to participate in the meme coin space. By offering a structured staking protocol, Crypto All-Stars provides fans and investors with a means to earn rewards while supporting the broader meme coin community.

Conclusion

As the cryptocurrency market continues to evolve, regulators, celebrities, and fans must remain vigilant and informed of the risks and responsibilities associated with this new trend.

The SEC’s enforcement actions and the volatile nature of the cryptocurrency market remind us of the potential pitfalls. Whether these tokens are securities is not just a legal question, but also a moral question in the broadest sense.

Celebrities must weigh the potential benefits and risks, and consider their responsibility to their fans. Only by doing so can they operate in a manner that is both legal and ethical.

ADVT. 

This article is brought to you by Clickout Media