Georgia Tests New Voting System for 2020 Election

A handful of local elections in Georgia are being used to test new voting machines that combine touchscreens with a printed ballot, part of the state’s rush to meet a court-ordered deadline to retire its outdated, paperless system before any votes are cast in 2020.

State election officials are piloting the $106 million systems in six mostly rural counties holding elections Tuesday for mayors, city councils and school boards.
Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger plans to use the new machines in all 159 counties for Georgia’s presidential primaries in March.

The way Georgia conducts elections next year will be closely watched nationally after the officials faced a torrent of criticism in 2018.
Problems included hours-long waits at some polling sites, security breaches that left voters’ registration information exposed and accusations that strict ID matching requirements and registration errors suppressed turnout.
That led to lawsuits and changes in state law that included switching election systems.

Part of our ongoing communications and outreach plan — County Clerk explains new election procedures during LB City Council meeting https://t.co/78Kwtcx4to #VSAP #VotingRevolutionized

— Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk (@LACountyRRCC) October 18, 2019

A federal judge in August upped the pressure for a new system. U.S. District Court Judge Amy Totenberg gave Georgia until Jan. 1 to retire the election system in use since 2002, calling it “seriously flawed.”

Thomas McCoy, a 55-year-old machinist, cast his first votes on one of the new machines Tuesday morning in Cartersville.
He called the new system “great, easy,” and said he was glad to be rid of the paperless machines after one malfunctioned on him in a prior election.

“This one I could actually print it out and look at it and knew right off the bat this was where I was going,” McCoy said.

Though the new machines create a paper record, a positive trial run Tuesday isn’t likely to satisfy advocates for greater election integrity.
They insist the new system remains vulnerable and fails to deliver the auditable results they demand.

It’s ElectionDay! Elections happening today, Tuesday, Nov 5th:
CA
CO
KS
KY
LA
ME
MN
MS
NC
NJ
OH
PA
TX
VA
WA

Governor races: KY, LA, MS
State legislative races: LA, MS, VA, NJ
Ballot initiatives, mayoral races, local elections & more

Call us at 866-OUR-VOTE for help! #VoteOnNov5 pic.twitter.com/iPp9awgaJq

— Kristen Clarke (@KristenClarkeJD) November 5, 2019

“Even if everything goes smoothly, that doesn’t solve the problems,” said Marilyn Marks, executive director of the Coalition for Good Governance.

Election officials counties chosen to test the new machines said voters had few problems during three weeks of advance voting ahead of Tuesday’s elections.
The Secretary of State’s office said more than 9,300 people voted early in the six counties.

“It’s been a whole lot better than I thought it would be,” said Rickey Kittle, election board chairman for Catoosa County near the Tennessee line.
“When you change anything, you always fear for the worst.
It just didn’t happen.”

The new machines work similarly to the old ones, with voters making choices on touchscreens.

But the new machines, unlike the old, print a paper ballot with a list of each vote cast and a computer code designed to match those choices.
That printout is inserted into a scanner that reads the code and stores the votes electronically for tabulation.
Printouts are retained in case an election must be audited later.

Those getting familiar with the system have already begun sizing it up.

Some note the typeface on the newly printed ballots might be small for some eyes.
Lowndes County, near the Georgia-Florida line, had magnifying glasses on hand for voters if needed, said Tiffany Linkswiler, the assistant elections superintendent.

Linkswiler and Carol Heard, elections supervisor for Decatur County in southwest Georgia, said a few voters making final checks caught mistakes.
The erroneous ballots were voided and they cast new ones.

“We had two spoiled ballots, which shows me at least two voters paid attention to their ballots after they printed them out,” Heard said.
“So that’s a good sign.
It means there’s that opportunity” to correct errors.

But Marks said poll observers for the Coalition for Good Governance saw many voters scan ballots without bothering to check them for accuracy.
If computer-generated ballots are cast without voters reviewing them, she said, audits are meaningless because “you don’t know what the voter intended.”

Advocates, including Marks’ group, and individual Georgia voters who sued over the state’s old machines are now challenging the new ones in court.
They have requests pending, asking the judge to stop the statewide rollout of the new machines.

The judge also ordered Cobb County in suburban Atlanta to run a different test Tuesday, using hand-marked paper ballots that are scanned electronically.
That’s the kind of system Marks’ group is recommending, but the judge ordered it tested only as a fallback, in case Georgia doesn’t have the new machines ready for the March primaries.

___

Bynum reported from Savannah, Georgia.

Inquirer.net will receive a commission on purchases made*